Build one machine- and test-state-specific acceptance record from identity and the quoted definition through the contractual method, opening-state basis, measurement chain, raw observations, reported result, limitations, criterion and final disposition.
Keep the quoted value, controller entry and controlled result in separate rows. Keep opening force separate again from opening stroke, demolding, ejector, robot handoff and cycle performance.
Build the fixed nominal opening-force acceptance briefNo NEW ORIENTAL IMM opening-force test, measurement instrument, calibration, accuracy, repeatability, tolerance, result, EUROMAP 8 implementation or compliance, ISO 20430 compliance, certification, conformity or passed acceptance is claimed.
No fixed opening position, speed, movement window, load, instrument, range, correction, repetition count, allowable deviation, default method, tolerance or pass/fail rule is supplied. Actual values and methods require controlled project evidence and approval.
The same machine, clamping unit, mold or FAT/SAT file may appear in several records, but each route answers a different procurement question.
| Decision owner | Owns | Must stay separate |
|---|---|---|
| Machine-side nominal opening-force acceptance record | One exact machine and clamping-unit configuration, the quoted definition and value, selected method, conditions and opening-state basis, measurement chain, raw observations, reported result, limitations, project criterion and disposition. | It does not prescribe a test procedure, prove a supplier result or release another machine, configuration, opening state, mold or production process. |
| Maximum clamping-force acceptance | The separately quoted maximum-clamping-force value, selected force-test basis, machine state, measurement chain, raw record, result and disposition. | Closing/clamping force and opening force are different evidence questions; neither value proves the other. |
| Mold envelope, opening stroke and daylight fit | Released machine and mold drawings, mold height, opening stroke, daylight, tie-bar clearance, access and the exact geometric fit record. | A force record does not prove available stroke, daylight, clearance, mold removal access or fit. |
| Demolding, ejector and part-removal handoff | Part-release evidence, mold actions, ejector stroke/force/interface, robot handoff, sequence, faults and acceptance for the exact mold and process. | Nominal opening force does not prove demolding, part release, ejector capacity, robot compatibility or a successful removal sequence. |
| Dry cycle and production cycle acceptance | The selected cycle method, movement profile, exclusions, auxiliaries, mold/material/process state, raw timings and approved result. | An opening-force value does not establish opening speed, dry-cycle time, production cycle, output or repeatability. |
| Complete FAT and SAT programme | The complete approved machine/cell scope, safe conditions, instruments, observations, witnesses, deviations, retest and acceptance authority. | This page supplies one evidence register, not a complete FAT/SAT procedure, safety validation or production release. |
| Machine safety and conformity evidence | Applicable legal regime, risk assessment, safeguards, declarations, standards evidence, instructions and responsible economic-operator records. | An opening-force record and a standard title do not prove safety, legal compliance, conformity, certification or CE documentation. |
Historical recommendations and the current ISO safety record may frame questions. Only the controlled project record releases a result for the exact machine, configuration and test state.
| Source | Public status | May inform | Cannot release |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUROMAP technical-recommendations catalogue | Current catalogue reviewed 2 August 2026; lists EUROMAP 8 (1974) for nominal opening force and keeps EUROMAP 7, 9 and 10 separate | The document number, historical year, public title and the distinct evidence question assigned to each recommendation. | An ISO status, legal requirement, certification, universal procedure, supplier capability, measured result or project acceptance. |
| EUROMAP 8 (1974) | Official historical recommendation titled for determination of the nominal opening force of injection moulding machines | The candidate method-and-edition row only when project parties agree its contractual applicability for the exact machine and configuration. | A fixed state, position, load, instrument, repetition count, correction, tolerance, pass/fail rule or NEW ORIENTAL IMM result. |
| EUROMAP 7 (1995) | Official historical recommendation separately titled for determination of maximum clamping force | A distinct adjacent evidence request where machine-side maximum clamping force matters to the project. | Nominal opening force, opening stroke, demolding performance or an interchangeable EUROMAP 8 method. |
| EUROMAP 9 (1998) | Official historical recommendation separately titled for platen-parallelism testing during closing | A separate machine-side parallelism record where that geometry question is in the acceptance scope. | Nominal opening force, surface flatness, force distribution, mold fit or an interchangeable EUROMAP 8 method. |
| EUROMAP 10 (1975) | Official historical recommendation for general rules for testing injection moulding machines | A contractual discussion about buyer/supplier test scope, acceptance stage and document disposition. | A universally current procedure, a substitute for EUROMAP 8, a fixed acceptance rule or a complete FAT/SAT programme. |
| ISO 20430:2020 | Published injection-moulding-machine safety standard; current public ISO record confirmed in 2025 | Only the separate safety-scope and standards-evidence discussion for the exact machine and destination market. | An opening-force performance method, measured result, supplier compliance, conformity, certification or acceptance result. |
| Controlled project acceptance record | Machine-, configuration- and test-state-specific evidence agreed by the responsible project parties | The actual identity, claimed definition/value, selected method, preconditions, state basis, measurement chain, raw observations, result, limitations, criterion and disposition. | Another machine or state, a universal tolerance, opening-stroke result, demolding result, cycle result, safety result or unsupported supplier claim. |
Leave unknowns open. Do not fill them from a catalogue label, controller screen, standard title, machine-family statement or another project's record.
| RFQ field | Record | Evidence to request |
|---|---|---|
| Exact machine and clamping-unit configuration | Machine identity, clamping architecture, included drive/control configuration, relevant revisions and the physical unit presented for acceptance | Controlled identity/configuration record that prevents a series name or another machine from standing in for the tested unit |
| Controlled quotation and specification revision | Quotation, technical specification, clamping-unit data and amendment revisions that define the purchased and inspected scope | Buyer-approved document index with superseded revisions retained and conflicts still visible |
| Quoted nominal opening-force definition, value and unit | Exact supplier label, definition, value, unit and source document, including whether the entry is nominal, rated, set, calculated or measured | Controlled supplier statement without treating a catalogue value, controller entry or drive rating as a measured result |
| Decision purpose and acceptance stage | Buyer decision served, factory/site stage, release boundary and questions deliberately excluded | Approved acceptance matrix showing why the record is needed and which later decisions remain open |
| Selected method and edition | Named method, document number, year or edition, applicability decision, agreed amendments and responsible method owner | Contract-controlled reference; this page supplies no default method and reproduces no protected procedure detail |
| Contractual scope and document precedence | Included parties, responsibilities, deliverables, exclusions, acceptance authority and precedence among purchase documents | Signed requirement matrix retaining unresolved conflicts rather than filling them from generic guidance |
| Machine and environmental preconditions | Required machine state, preparation, environment, stabilization basis, safety controls and limitation owners for the agreed test | Method- and machine-specific approved condition record; this page prescribes no setup value |
| Opening state and movement-window basis | The agreed machine state and movement boundary over which the opening-force result applies, with state identification and exclusions | Controlled method/test-state record; this page supplies no default position, speed, stroke, load or movement window |
| Mold, fixture and installed-load state | Whether a mold, fixture or other relevant component is installed and the exact configuration to which the observation applies | Released configuration record without assuming that one installed-load state transfers to another |
| Measurement principle and force path | The physical measurement principle, relationship to the clamping/opening system, interpretation and declared limitations | Configuration-specific technical statement from the responsible test party without a default instrument or principle |
| Measurement locations and channel mapping | Every agreed location, reference system, channel relationship, mapping and responsibility for installed or temporary equipment | Released drawing or method record; no universal location or force-path inference is supplied |
| Instrument identity and range | Instrument manufacturer/model/serial identity, configured range, unit, revision, connection and applicability declaration | Device-specific record from the responsible party; no instrument, range or accuracy is attributed to NEW ORIENTAL IMM |
| Calibration or verification traceability | Calibration or verification record, date/status, traceability statement, applicability and limitation owner | Dated instrument-specific evidence; no interval, laboratory, method, accuracy or traceability claim is supplied here |
| Repetitions, sequence reference and raw observations | The contract-agreed observation count, sequence reference, unrounded raw entries, invalid observations and retained data location | Complete signed/raw record with exclusions explained; this page sets no repetition count or sequence |
| Reported result, expression and unit | Reported nominal opening-force result, expression/unit, calculation and rounding treatment, source record and responsible reporter | Machine- and state-specific report clearly separated from the quoted value, controller entries and drive ratings |
| Uncertainty and stated limitations | Declared measurement uncertainty where supplied, method/instrument limitations, excluded effects and interpretation boundary | Responsible-party statement; absence remains visible and no generic accuracy or repeatability is inferred |
| Project criterion and responsible approver | Contract source for the project-specific criterion, expression/unit, approval status, exception authority and named role | Buyer/supplier-approved requirement; no allowable deviation, tolerance or pass/fail rule is supplied by this page |
| Witnesses, deviations, retest, report disposition and change triggers | Required witnesses, observations, deviations, containment, retest decision, approvals, final report location and events requiring review | Signed disposition record that does not turn a partial observation, unsigned draft or changed machine state into acceptance |
Buyer, supplier and responsible test/acceptance parties own the selected method, safe conditions, instruments, criteria and release.
One exact machine/configuration, controlled revisions and the supplier's exact nominal opening-force definition, value and unit.
A series label, controller value or drive rating cannot substitute for a configuration-specific result.The agreed method/edition, contractual precedence, preconditions, opening state/window, installed-load state, principle, locations, instrument and calibration record.
A recommendation title alone does not prove that a method was selected, followed or applicable.Raw observations, reported expression/unit, declared uncertainty or limitations and traceable responsible parties.
A quoted value and controller entry remain separate from a controlled opening-force result.Project criterion, approvals, witnesses, deviations, retest, final report disposition and configuration-change triggers.
One accepted force record does not prove stroke, daylight, demolding, ejector, cycle, output, safety or another machine.Reviewed 2 August 2026. The EUROMAP catalogue lists EUROMAP 8 (1974) for nominal opening force and keeps EUROMAP 7, 9 and 10 separate. ISO 20430:2020 is a published machine-safety standard whose current public record was confirmed in 2025; it is not the nominal-opening-force performance method. None of these records proves a NEW ORIENTAL IMM result, compliance, certification, conformity or passed acceptance.
The catalogue reviewed 2 August 2026 lists EUROMAP 8 (1974) for nominal opening force and separately lists EUROMAP 7 (1995), EUROMAP 9 (1998) and EUROMAP 10 (1975).
Boundary: Catalogue presence supplies a public title and historical year only. It does not establish ISO status, legal force, certification, supplier capability, a universal procedure or a machine result.
The official historical recommendation is the directly named opening-force source that project parties may select contractually.
Boundary: No protected procedure, fixed state, position, speed, load, instrument, correction, repetition count, allowable deviation, tolerance, pass/fail rule or NEW ORIENTAL IMM result is reproduced or inferred.
The official historical recommendation identifies maximum clamping force as a separate machine-side evidence question.
Boundary: It is not equivalent to EUROMAP 8 and does not prove nominal opening force, opening stroke, demolding, ejector performance or cycle performance.
The official historical recommendation identifies platen parallelism as another separate machine-side evidence question.
Boundary: It is not equivalent to EUROMAP 8 and does not prove nominal opening force, surface flatness, force distribution, mold fit or production quality.
The official historical recommendation provides general buyer/supplier testing context whose applicability must be agreed in the contract.
Boundary: It is not reproduced as a universal current procedure, a substitute for EUROMAP 8, a fixed acceptance criterion or a complete FAT/SAT programme.
ISO's current public record identifies the published safety standard and records confirmation in 2025.
Boundary: Its scope is machine safety. It is not the nominal-opening-force performance method and proves no measured result, supplier compliance, conformity, certification or acceptance result.
The answers keep opening force, closing force, stroke, mold fit, demolding, ejector, cycle performance, safety and supplier claims in separate controlled records.
No. Keep the quoted definition, value, unit and revision as one field, then separately agree the exact machine/configuration, method, conditions and opening-state basis, measurement chain, raw observations, reported result, limitations, project criterion and disposition.
No. Opening stroke, daylight, tie-bar clearance and mold access belong in the geometric fit record using released machine and mold drawings. Force does not establish distance, clearance or access.
No. Demolding depends on the exact part, mold, process, mold actions and release evidence. Ejector and robot handoff require their own stroke, force, interface, sequence and acceptance records.
No. No opening-force test, instrument, calibration, accuracy, repeatability, tolerance, method implementation, result, compliance, certification or passed acceptance is attributed to NEW ORIENTAL IMM.
No. EUROMAP's catalogue lists it as a historical technical recommendation. This page does not turn EUROMAP 8 into ISO 20430, a legal requirement, certification, conformity route or proof of supplier compliance.
No. ISO's public record identifies a machine-safety standard, not the nominal-opening-force performance method. A title does not prove a measured result, implemented requirement, conformity, certification or acceptance.
This page supplies no default. The contract and responsible technical parties must identify the selected method/edition, applicable conditions and state, measurement principle and locations, instrument and calibration evidence, raw-observation plan, criterion and approval authority.
Request all eighteen fixed fields: machine/configuration; controlled revisions; quoted definition/value/unit; purpose/stage; method/edition; contract precedence; preconditions; opening state/window; installed-load state; principle/force path; locations/channels; instrument/range; calibration; repetitions/raw observations; result/expression/unit; uncertainty/limitations; criterion/approver; and witnesses, deviations, retest, report disposition and change triggers.
Attach the machine and clamping-unit configuration, controlled quotation/specification revisions, quoted definition/value/unit, purpose and stage, selected method and edition, contractual scope and precedence, preconditions, opening-state/window basis, mold/fixture/installed-load state, measurement principle and force path, locations and channel mapping, instrument and calibration evidence, repetitions and raw observations, reported result/expression/unit, uncertainty or limitations, criterion and approver, witnesses, deviations, retest, report disposition and change triggers. Keep every unconfirmed value, method, instrument, tolerance, compliance statement and result open.
Build the machine brief