Lock the quoted field
Preserve the supplier's exact label, value, unit or expression, source revision and evidence status before normalizing it.
G35
INJECTION EFFICIENCY / ACCEPTANCE RECORD
A quoted actual injection efficiency is not proof of the exact injection unit’s controlled EUROMAP 4 result.
Build one machine-, injection-unit- and screw-or-plunger-configuration-specific acceptance record from the original quoted field through the agreed method and theoretical basis, controlled test state, measurement chain, raw observations, calculation, reported result, limitations, criterion and final disposition.
ANSWER FIRST
Accept the bounded comparison record—not an efficiency label by itself.
EUROMAP 4 is useful only when the quoted field stays attached to one exact injection configuration, a controlled theoretical basis, the selected document, test state, measurement chain and auditable calculation. Energy, production, pressure/flow, cavity pressure, quality and safety remain separate decisions.
Carry the fixed acceptance context into the RFQPublication boundary
No NEW ORIENTAL IMM EUROMAP 4 test, apparatus, instrument, calibration, material, setting, raw record, calculation, result, implementation, compliance, certification, conformity or passed acceptance is claimed.
Unknown supplier evidence remains open. This route provides no default procedure, material, apparatus, pressure, speed, stroke, sequence, sample count, tolerance, threshold or pass/fail rule.
ONE OWNER / SEVEN ADJACENT DECISIONS
Keep the EUROMAP 4 record inside its comparison boundary.
Reuse the controlled injection-unit identity across reviews, but do not let one coefficient take ownership of a different performance, quality, safety or supplier-acceptance question.
Scroll horizontally to view all columns.
| Decision | Owns | Stays separate |
|---|---|---|
| Actual-injection-efficiency acceptance record | One exact machine, injection unit and installed screw-or-plunger configuration; the supplier's original quoted field; EUROMAP 4 edition and applicability; controlled test state; measurement chain; raw observations; calculation record; result; limitations; project criterion and disposition. | It does not prescribe the official procedure, prove supplier testing or release another injection unit, screw/plunger, material, software state or operating condition. |
| Machine or product energy efficiency | The applicable machine-energy or product-related energy boundary, operating state, measurement method, consumption record and agreed comparison basis. | The EUROMAP 4 coefficient is not an energy-efficiency class, energy-consumption result, utility guarantee or operating-cost result. |
| Production efficiency, cycle, throughput and yield | The intended mold, resin, complete production sequence, automation, cooling, downtime, quality criteria, accepted parts and measured time boundary. | An injection-stage comparison coefficient does not establish cycle time, hourly output, accepted yield, overall equipment effectiveness or production capability. |
| Plasticizing-capacity acceptance | The exact plasticizing configuration, reference material, EUROMAP 19 or other agreed basis, mass/time observations, reported rate and bounded disposition. | EUROMAP 4 does not determine plasticizing capacity, recovery time, melt preparation or an interchangeable EUROMAP 19 result. |
| Injection-pressure and flow capability | Pressure location and definition, force basis, screw/plunger area, axial speed, volume-flow field, simultaneous limits, settings and configured capability evidence. | Pressure and speed may be method inputs, but the EUROMAP 4 comparison result does not release maximum pressure, maximum flow or simultaneous production capability. |
| Cavity pressure and process monitoring | The identified mold, cavity, sensor, channel, measurement chain, validity state, monitoring output and physical part-disposition authority. | A machine-side injection-efficiency record does not measure cavity pressure, validate a process window or authorize closed-loop control or part sorting. |
| Part and melt quality | The actual resin, mold, process window, sampling plan, dimensional/visual/material criteria, traceable results and responsible quality disposition. | The coefficient does not prove fill, melt quality, dimensional capability, repeatability, defect rate or fitness of a molded part. |
| Safety, certification and complete supplier acceptance | Applicable safety requirements, conformity evidence, guarding and validation plus the complete FAT/SAT scope, witnesses, deviations, retest and final acceptance authority. | This route is not a safety assessment, certification, supplier-approval claim or complete machine/cell acceptance programme. |
SOURCE STATUS / CLAIM LIMIT
Use every named source only for the question it answers.
Historical performance recommendations, energy documents, safety scope and project evidence remain separate rows.
Scroll horizontally to view all columns.
| Source | Public status | May inform | Cannot release |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUROMAP technical-recommendations catalogue | Current catalogue reviewed 2 August 2026; lists EUROMAP 4 (1994) for actual injection efficiency, EUROMAP 19 (1995) for plasticizing capacity and EUROMAP 60 (2013) for energy efficiency as separate recommendations. | Document number, historical year, official title and the separate buyer decision associated with each recommendation. | ISO status, legal force, certification, universal contractual applicability, supplier implementation, a configured machine result or passed acceptance. |
| EUROMAP 4 (December 1994) | Official historical recommendation for determining theoretical injection capacity and a coefficient of efficiency for comparison reasons. | A contractually selected method-and-edition row and the need to retain the theoretical basis, actual injection-power evidence and coefficient calculation for one exact configuration. | It cannot release a NEW ORIENTAL IMM test, apparatus, material, setting, observation, result, compliance claim, tolerance, pass/fail rule or approval. |
| EUROMAP 19 (1995) | Official historical recommendation separately listed for determination of plasticizing capacity. | A separate plasticizing-capacity evidence question when the project parties select it. | Actual injection efficiency, energy efficiency, pressure/flow capability, recovery, part quality or an interchangeable EUROMAP 4 result. |
| EUROMAP 60.1 and 60.2 (2013) | Official catalogue entries separately titled for machine-related energy-efficiency class and product-related energy consumption. | Why an energy decision requires its own selected document, boundary and evidence record. | An energy class, consumption value, legal status, supplier result or equivalence with the EUROMAP 4 coefficient. |
| ISO 20430:2020 | Published injection-moulding-machine safety standard, reviewed and confirmed in 2025. | A separate machine-safety scope when the proposed supply and destination make it applicable. | An EUROMAP 4 method, actual-injection-efficiency result, supplier conformity, certification, safety result or machine acceptance. |
| Project-specific controlled evidence | Not supplied for a NEW ORIENTAL IMM machine, injection unit or screw/plunger configuration. | Only the exact quotation, configuration, agreed method, conditions, instruments, raw observations, calculations, result, limitations and signed disposition received for the project. | Any missing supplier test capability, apparatus, value, setting, record, result, compliance, certification or passed acceptance. |
FIXED RFQ CONTRACT / 18 FIELDS
Carry configuration, theoretical basis, raw evidence and disposition together.
Unknown entries remain open. No catalogue title, controller screen or another machine's record may silently fill them.
Scroll horizontally to view all columns.
| RFQ field | Record | Boundary |
|---|---|---|
| Exact machine, injection-unit and screw/plunger configuration | Manufacturer, model, serial or project identity; injection-unit and drive designation; installed screw or plunger identity and every option that changes the quoted or tested field. | A machine family, clamping-force label or injection-unit family does not identify the as-quoted or as-tested configuration. |
| Controlled quotation, specification, drawing and software revisions | Revision, date, owner and precedence for each document that identifies the offered and test-state configuration. | An undated table, screenshot or superseded brochure does not close the configuration record. |
| Quoted field label, value, unit or expression and source location | Supplier's original wording, number, unit or expression, evidence status, reference and source location without silent relabelling. | An efficiency label, percentage, coefficient, power, capacity, pressure and flow field are not interchangeable by name alone. |
| Theoretical injection-capacity basis and controlled inputs | The approved screw/plunger cross-section basis, theoretical axial-speed source, revision, calculation owner and traceable units used by the selected method. | The theoretical basis is not proof of actual flow, maximum simultaneous capability, a production setting or a machine result. |
| Decision purpose and acceptance stage | Quotation comparison, contract review, FAT, SAT or another named stage and the exact decision the record is intended to support. | One comparison-stage disposition does not release production, safety, quality or a later acceptance stage. |
| Selected method, document year or edition and applicability | EUROMAP 4 December 1994 or another controlled method, selected clauses or supplier procedure and written reason it applies to the exact configuration. | Catalogue presence does not make EUROMAP 4 mandatory, current for every contract or automatically implemented by a supplier. |
| Contractual scope, exceptions and document precedence | Parties, supply boundary, governing project document, approved exceptions and treatment of conflicts between quotation, specification and test plan. | This worksheet does not decide legal or contractual authority and does not replace a signed acceptance plan. |
| Machine, utility, environmental and readiness preconditions | As-agreed machine state, utilities, environment, warm-up or readiness evidence and every condition that can affect the record. | No universal utility value, readiness condition, warm-up rule or operating state is prescribed here. |
| Test material identity, batch, condition and source documents | Material manufacturer and grade, batch or lot, modification/color state, conditioning and controlled documents retained by the test owner. | This page does not publish a default material, melt condition or preparation rule and does not transfer a result to another material. |
| Screw/plunger, barrel, non-return valve, nozzle and drive identity and condition | Part numbers or controlled geometry identifiers, diameter or area basis, inspection state, installed drive and relevant component changes. | The record does not approve component suitability, wear life, material compatibility, melt quality or part quality. |
| Measurement principle, apparatus, locations and data path | Selected principle, controlled apparatus identity or drawing, pressure/time/stroke locations, acquisition path and responsible owner required by the agreed method. | No apparatus, nozzle, sensor, timer, position device or measurement location is supplied or recommended by this page. |
| Instrument identity, range and calibration or verification traceability | Instrument manufacturer/model/serial, range, resolution where relevant, calibration or verification record, date, status and traceability owner. | An instrument name or certificate title alone does not prove suitability, accuracy, calibration validity or a machine result. |
| Controlled operating state, pressure points, stroke window and sequence | Approved operating-state reference, selected pressure-point and movement-window plan, actual settings, sequence and deviations retained by the test owner. | The page gives no default pressure, speed, stroke percentage, temperature, sequence, ramp, dwell or controller setting. |
| Raw pressure, time, stroke and speed observations | Complete timestamped observations, measurement-run identity, inclusion/exclusion decisions, interruptions and approved sampling or repetition reference. | No pressure count, repetition count, interval, curve-fitting choice or data-exclusion rule is prescribed. |
| Injection-power and coefficient calculation, result, unit and rounding | Traceable theoretical and actual injection-power calculation records, coefficient calculation, original/reported results, unit handling, rounding, reviewer and source file. | A reported coefficient does not become energy efficiency, production efficiency, pressure/flow capability, throughput, quality or safety proof. |
| Uncertainty, limitations and non-transferability | Known measurement and method limitations, configuration/material/state scope, excluded conclusions and conditions that prevent comparison or transfer. | Matching labels or units do not make records comparable when machine, injection unit, screw/plunger, method or conditions differ. |
| Project criterion and responsible approver | Project-specific acceptance criterion, source and revision, rationale, responsible technical/commercial approver and decision date. | EUROMAP 4 does not supply this project's tolerance, pass/fail threshold, safety margin or acceptance authority. |
| Witnesses, deviations, retest, disposition and change triggers | Witness identities, signed deviations, open actions, retest rule, final disposition and configuration/material/method/software changes that reopen the record. | A bounded report does not approve a changed machine, injection unit, screw/plunger, material, software state or production job. |
RELEASE SEQUENCE
Move from a quoted label to a bounded acceptance disposition.
A missing configuration, theoretical basis, condition, instrument, raw record or calculation remains a hold point rather than an assumed result.
Lock the configuration
Tie the field to one machine, injection unit, screw-or-plunger geometry, drive, melt path and software/document baseline.
Agree the method boundary
Record the controlled EUROMAP 4 edition or other procedure, contractual applicability, theoretical basis, conditions, measurement chain and owners.
Retain the raw record
Keep test-state, material, instrument, pressure, time, stroke, speed, calculation, exclusion, deviation and review evidence needed to audit the result.
Limit the disposition
Accept, reject or hold only the stated EUROMAP 4 comparison record. Use separate evidence for energy, production, pressure/flow, quality, safety and complete supplier acceptance.
PRIMARY SOURCES / BOUNDARY
Use official titles and scope without transferring capability.
Reviewed 2 August 2026. EUROMAP's current catalogue lists EUROMAP 4 (1994) for actual injection efficiency, EUROMAP 19 (1995) for plasticizing capacity and EUROMAP 60 (2013) for energy efficiency as separate recommendations; ISO 20430 remains machine safety. None proves a NEW ORIENTAL IMM machine, injection configuration, apparatus, instrument, material, setting, result, compliance, certification or delivered case.
Technical Recommendations Catalogue
The catalogue reviewed 2 August 2026 lists EUROMAP 4 (1994) for actual injection efficiency, EUROMAP 19 (1995) for plasticizing capacity and EUROMAP 60 (2013) for energy efficiency as separate recommendations.
Boundary: Catalogue presence supplies official titles and historical publication context only; it is not ISO status, law, certification, supplier implementation, a configured result or acceptance.
EUROMAP 4 (December 1994) — Determination of the Actual Injection Efficiency
Defines theoretical injection capacity and a coefficient of efficiency for comparison reasons, with a controlled relationship between theoretical and measured injection-stage evidence.
Boundary: Use the official document for its procedure. This page does not reproduce or prescribe apparatus, material, temperature, pressure points, stroke window, sequence, calculation details, tolerance or pass/fail rule and attributes no supplier result.
EUROMAP 19 (1995) — Determination of the Plasticizing Capacity
The official catalogue and recommendation identify plasticizing capacity as a separate machine-side comparison question.
Boundary: It is not EUROMAP 4 actual injection efficiency, energy efficiency, production performance, pressure/flow capability or part-quality proof.
EUROMAP 60.1 and 60.2 — Energy Efficiency
The official catalogue separately identifies machine-related energy-efficiency class and product-related energy consumption recommendations.
Boundary: Those titles do not make the EUROMAP 4 coefficient an energy result and do not prove an energy class, consumption value, supplier result or equivalence.
ISO 20430:2020 — Injection Moulding Machines Safety Requirements
ISO's current public record identifies the safety standard as published and confirmed in 2025.
Boundary: It is not the EUROMAP 4 performance method and does not prove an actual-injection-efficiency result, supplier compliance, conformity, certification, safety result or acceptance.
BUYER QUESTIONS
Actual-injection-efficiency acceptance FAQ
These answers keep an EUROMAP 4 comparison coefficient separate from energy, production, plasticizing, pressure/flow, cavity pressure, part quality, safety and supplier claims.
01What does EUROMAP 4 actual injection efficiency compare?+
The official 1994 recommendation defines a theoretical injection-capacity basis and a coefficient of efficiency for comparison reasons. Use the controlled document for the full method. A buyer record should retain the exact configuration, theoretical basis, controlled measurements, calculation, result and limitations without expanding the coefficient into other performance claims.
02Is EUROMAP 4 actual injection efficiency the same as energy efficiency?+
No. EUROMAP's current catalogue separately lists EUROMAP 60.1 for machine-related energy-efficiency class and EUROMAP 60.2 for product-related energy consumption. The EUROMAP 4 coefficient is not an energy class, consumption result, utility guarantee or operating-cost result.
03Does the coefficient prove production efficiency or throughput?+
No. Production evidence requires the actual mold, resin, complete cycle, automation, cooling, quality criteria, downtime boundary and accepted output. The coefficient does not establish cycle time, throughput, yield, OEE or production capability.
04Are EUROMAP 4 and EUROMAP 19 interchangeable?+
No. EUROMAP 4 addresses actual injection efficiency for comparison reasons, while EUROMAP 19 addresses plasticizing capacity. Neither substitutes for the other or proves recovery, melt quality, part quality or production output.
05Does EUROMAP 4 prove maximum injection pressure or flow capability?+
No. Pressure and speed records may be inputs to the selected method, but the resulting coefficient does not release maximum pressure, maximum flow, simultaneous pressure/flow capability, cavity pressure or a production setting.
06Is EUROMAP 4 an ISO standard, law or certification?+
No. EUROMAP lists it as a historical technical recommendation. Project parties must agree contractual applicability and the selected edition. Its title does not create legal force, certification, supplier implementation or passed acceptance.
07Does ISO 20430 prove actual-injection-efficiency acceptance?+
No. ISO 20430:2020 concerns injection-moulding-machine safety within its published scope. It is not the EUROMAP 4 performance method and cannot establish a coefficient, supplier compliance, certification or project acceptance.
08What should a buyer request before accepting the quoted field?+
Request the exact machine/injection-unit/screw-or-plunger configuration, controlled source revisions, original field, theoretical basis, selected method and applicability, test state, material and apparatus records, measurement chain, raw observations, calculations, result, uncertainty, limitations, project criterion, witnesses, deviations and final disposition.
ACTUAL INJECTION EFFICIENCY / NEXT STEP
Send the original quoted field with its complete evidence boundary.
Attach the exact machine/injection-unit/screw-or-plunger configuration, controlled source, theoretical basis, selected method and applicability, test-state and instrument records, raw observations, calculations, reported result, uncertainty, limitations, criterion, deviations and disposition. Keep energy, production, pressure/flow, quality and safety evidence in separate rows.
Build the machine brief