Fix the event and date facts
Record destination, first placing-on-the-market and putting-into-service facts separately from shipment, arrival and commissioning. Assign the case-specific legal decision.
G21
EU MARKET / DOCUMENT RELEASE
EU-bound injection molding machines need the legal date, product status and document route fixed before release.
Record the applicable machinery regime, final supply boundary, responsible EU economic operators, other project actors, declaration and marking route, instructions, technical-document index, standards status and unresolved integration actions before order, FAT or shipment release.
ANSWER FIRST
A certificate is not the release decision.
Start with the event date and exact supplied assembly. Then assign product status and EU economic-operator decisions while keeping buyer/end user, integrator and other project actors separate before choosing a declaration, marking or document path. Keep every unconfirmed field open.
Introduce the destination requirement during selectionDocument-release gate
- Applicable event, date and legal regime
- Final product and integration boundary
- EU economic operators separated from other project actors
- Declaration, marking, instructions and document index
- Current standards status, deviations and change control
LEGAL-DATE SCREEN
Do not collapse six project dates into one transition answer.
The responsible party must apply the current legal text to the project facts. This table preserves the facts needed for that decision; it does not make the decision.
| Project timing or change | Working legal screen | Record before release |
|---|---|---|
| Before 20 January 2027 | The European Commission identifies Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC as the current regime for machinery placed on the EU market before 20 January 2027. | Destination, intended first placing-on-the-market and putting-into-service facts, contract/shipment/arrival dates, responsible legal reviewer and the chosen legal basis. |
| From 20 January 2027 | The Commission states that Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 applies on a mandatory basis from 20 January 2027. | Recheck the then-current consolidated Regulation, transition facts, product status, EU economic operators, other project actors and project-specific conformity route before release. |
| Modified or integrated equipment | A later integration or modification can change the legal analysis. A shipping date or original nameplate alone does not decide the result. | Original and final scope, modification/integration record, intended use, responsible final integrator and the authority or qualified adviser used for the case-specific decision. |
STATUS / RESPONSIBILITY
Confirm product status; treat integration or modification as a review trigger.
Commercial labels such as “machine only,” “cell” or “CE package” do not classify the supply under EU law. An integrated cell or later modification is a reason to recheck the facts, not another statutory product-status label.
| Classification or review trigger | Decision inputs | Release consequence to confirm |
|---|---|---|
| Product status — machinery or related product | Identify the final supplied assembly, intended application, moving components, drive and included safety/integration scope under the applicable legal text. | Applicable conformity assessment, declaration and marking route for the exact final product—confirmed by the responsible party, not inferred by this page. |
| Product status — partly completed machinery | Identify what is incomplete, the machinery into which it will be incorporated, its assembly boundary and who completes the final conformity work. | Applicable Declaration of Incorporation, assembly instructions and final-machine hold point. Do not affix the complete-machine route by assumption. |
| Review trigger — integrated cell or later modification | This is not a parallel statutory product status. Record the machine, robot, guards, auxiliaries, interfaces, software and every change between supplier setup and the final installed cell. | Recheck product status, final-integration and manufacturer responsibilities from the actual supply or modification facts, with legal and risk-assessment actions kept open or closed by the responsible parties. |
RFQ / RELEASE REGISTER
Fourteen fields keep responsibility and evidence attached.
Use this as a procurement register. It is not a conformity procedure, risk assessment, technical-file template or complete list of legislation for a specific project.
| Register field | Record for the proposed supply | Evidence and boundary |
|---|---|---|
| EU destination and legal dates | Member State, intended first placing on the market and putting into service, plus contract, shipment, arrival, installation and commissioning dates kept as separate facts | Dated project schedule and responsible legal review; do not select a regime from shipment date alone |
| Product status | Proposed status under the applicable text: machinery/related product, partly completed machinery or another identified category, with the decision owner and reasoning | Case-specific written determination; this checklist does not classify the proposed supply |
| Supply and integration boundary | Machine, injection unit, robot, guards, auxiliaries, mold-related equipment, control/data interfaces, software and site work included or excluded | Controlled scope drawing, responsibility matrix and final-cell integrator identity |
| EU economic operators and other project actors | EU economic operators—manufacturer, authorised representative if appointed, importer, distributor and, where applicable under the Regulation, fulfilment service provider—recorded separately from buyer/end user, integrator, installer and other project actors | Legal names, addresses, written mandates and factual task boundaries. Whether an integrator or modifier becomes the manufacturer depends on the final supply or modification facts and applicable law; this checklist does not decide it |
| Exact equipment identity | Type/model, serial identity when assigned, year, configured options, software and safety-control revisions, and included third-party equipment | Order baseline, nameplate/artwork review, as-built list and controlled change history |
| Applicable legislation register | Machinery legal basis and every other EU harmonisation act identified by the responsible party for the exact product and date | Revision-controlled register; this page does not supply a complete project-specific legislation list |
| Conformity-assessment route | Selected procedure, responsible manufacturer, internal or third-party steps and notified-body identity/scope only where the applicable legislation requires one | Applicable articles/annexes and, where relevant, current NANDO scope; a voluntary certificate is not a substitute |
| Declaration package | Applicable EC/EU Declaration of Conformity, or Declaration of Incorporation and assembly instructions, with exact identity, legislation, signatory, date and required language | Draft-to-final document register and signed release copy; the declaration route follows the confirmed product status |
| CE marking and product traceability | Marking decision, nameplate/label content, manufacturer contact, product identity and consistency with the declaration and supplied configuration | Approved artwork, as-built photograph and cross-check; CE marking follows the prescribed assessment and is not placed on a certificate |
| Technical-documentation index | Risk-assessment and EHSR mapping status, drawings and safety circuits, calculations/tests, standards and applied clauses, residual risks and incorporated-product records | Index, revision, retention/availability holder and authority-response path. Full technical documentation is not presented as a universal buyer handover requirement |
| Instructions and languages | Installation, use, maintenance, residual-risk and integration information; destination language; digital access, download/save/print and any applicable paper-copy arrangement | Controlled deliverables matrix checked against the legal regime and contract; Regulation digital conditions are not back-copied into every Directive project |
| Standards evidence | Standard designation and edition, EN adoption, applied clauses, full/partial use, deviations and current Official Journal reference status for the applicable legal regime | Current OJ decision and project evidence. ISO publication alone does not establish harmonisation or supplier conformity |
| FAT/SAT and open actions | Tests supporting agreed functions/documents, site integration actions, deviations, owners, due dates, retest and final release status | FAT and SAT evidence and signed punch-list records are kept separate from the legal conformity decision |
| Change and final release control | Who reopens the review after a machine, guard, robot, auxiliary, software, intended-use, destination or integration change | Final revision index and signed release gate; post-release change is not allowed to silently invalidate the documented basis |
RELEASE SEQUENCE
Move from project facts to a controlled release decision.
The sequence assigns questions and records. Qualified responsible parties still determine the applicable law, design and conformity work.
Freeze the product and cell boundary
Identify the exact machine, third-party equipment, guards, software, excluded work and final integrator before choosing any declaration or marking route.
Confirm roles and legal route
Name each applicable EU economic operator; record buyer/end user, integrator, installer and other project actors separately; then document the applicable legislation and conformity-assessment path without assuming a third-party certificate is required or sufficient.
Build the document register
Connect identity, declarations, marking, instructions, technical-document index, standards evidence and agreed buyer deliverables to controlled revisions and owners.
Separate acceptance from conformity
Use FAT and SAT evidence for contracted checks, but keep unresolved legal, risk-assessment, integration and site responsibilities visible in their own release controls.
Recheck before final release
Revisit the law and harmonised-standard status, close deviations and re-open the review whenever configuration, software, integration, intended use, destination or timing changes.
PRIMARY SOURCES / BOUNDARY
Use current EU legal texts, Official Journal status and ISO scope separately.
Reviewed 31 July 2026. These official records define transition facts, legal-document questions and standard scope. They do not classify a proposed supply, perform conformity assessment or prove any NEW ORIENTAL IMM capability. Recheck every changeable legal and standards status at project release.
Machinery — EU machinery legislation, transition and compliance notices
The Commission identifies Directive 2006/42/EC as current, states that Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 applies mandatorily from 20 January 2027, and warns that voluntary or additional certificates are not recognised proof of compliance.
Boundary: The Commission says its services provide generic guidance only and recommends the relevant national authority for a specific machine. This page is procurement guidance, not a binding legal interpretation.
Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 — current consolidated text
Use the current consolidated Regulation for post-transition scope, manufacturer and economic-operator duties, conformity documents, marking, instructions and partly completed machinery requirements.
Boundary: The text does not let this page determine a proposed product's status, economic operators, applicable conformity procedure or project-specific obligations. Recheck the current consolidation at release.
Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC
Use the Directive for the applicable pre-transition declaration, partly completed machinery and technical-file framework after confirming the project's date and scope.
Boundary: A register cannot prove that a declaration, risk assessment or technical file exists, is complete or applies to the as-built configuration. It also cannot replace the responsible legal and engineering review.
Harmonised standards for machinery under Directive 2006/42/EC
The Commission page points to Official Journal implementing decisions and a consolidated summary of references under the Directive.
Boundary: The Commission says the summary is informational, may contain errors or withdrawn references and has no legal effect. Read the applicable Official Journal decisions together and recheck status at release.
Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2023/1586 — consolidated 15 May 2026
At the 31 July 2026 page review, EUR-Lex identified 15 May 2026 as the current consolidated version for harmonised machinery standards supporting Directive 2006/42/EC, including the EN ISO 20430:2020 reference.
Boundary: Consolidated text is a documentation tool. Recheck the current version, the authentic OJ acts and the exact reference status for the project's date. A Directive reference does not automatically establish status under Regulation (EU) 2023/1230.
ISO 20430:2020 — Injection moulding machines safety requirements
ISO states that the 2020 Edition 1 was reviewed and confirmed in 2025 and remains current; its official abstract defines the covered injection-moulding-machine safety scope and exclusions.
Boundary: The ISO page proves only publication status and scope. It does not prove EN harmonisation for a given regime, conformity assessment, certification, CE marking or any NEW ORIENTAL IMM configuration.
BUYER QUESTIONS
EU injection molding machine CE documentation FAQ
These answers keep legal dates, certificates, product status, technical documentation, standards and commercial acceptance in their proper boundaries.
01Which machinery law applies before and after 20 January 2027?+
The European Commission states that machinery placed on the EU market before 20 January 2027 must comply with Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC and that Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 applies mandatorily from that date. Do not decide from shipment date alone: record the actual placing-on-market and putting-into-service facts, scope, transition position and case-specific advice.
02Does this checklist decide whether the supply is machinery or partly completed machinery?+
No. The final assembly, intended application, included movement/drive, guards, control, integration and completion boundary must be reviewed under the applicable legal text by the responsible party. Keep the proposed status and decision owner open until that review is recorded.
03Is a cell integrator automatically the manufacturer or an EU economic operator?+
No. Keep legal EU economic operators separate from buyer/end user, integrator, installer and other project actors. Whether an integrator or modifier assumes manufacturer obligations depends on the final supply or modification facts and applicable law. Where Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 applies, also review whether a fulfilment service provider role is relevant. This checklist does not assign any role.
04Does a CE or voluntary certificate prove compliance?+
Not by itself. The Commission warns that voluntary or additional certificates are not a recognised means of proving compliance. CE marking follows the prescribed conformity assessment under the applicable legislation; a certificate should not carry the CE marking. Verify whether a notified body has any role in the actual procedure instead of assuming one is always required.
05Must the buyer receive the manufacturer's complete technical file?+
Do not state that as a universal handover rule. Record the technical-documentation index, the person responsible for its availability to authorities, retention/access arrangements and the specific drawings, instructions, declarations, test records and other deliverables agreed for the buyer and integrator.
06Does ISO 20430:2020 establish EU conformity for a machine?+
No. ISO confirms the standard's current publication status and scope. The project must separately verify the applicable EN adoption and Official Journal status, legal regime, applied clauses, risk assessment, conformity route and as-built evidence. No supplier conformity or certification follows from citing the ISO page.
07Can FAT or SAT close the EU conformity decision?+
FAT and SAT can provide objective evidence for agreed configuration, functions, interfaces, documents and site integration. They do not replace the applicable conformity assessment, risk assessment, declaration, marking, instructions, economic-operator or final-integration responsibilities.
08What belongs in the EU documentation RFQ context?+
Include destination and legal dates, proposed product status, complete supply/cell boundary, EU economic operators and other project actors, exact equipment identity, applicable legislation, conformity route, declarations, marking, technical-document index, instructions/languages, standards status, FAT/SAT actions and change-control ownership. Mark every unconfirmed field open.
EU DOCUMENT RELEASE / NEXT STEP
Send one dated responsibility and document register with the RFQ.
Attach destination and event dates, proposed product/cell boundary, EU economic operators and other project actors, exact identity, legal route, declarations, marking, document index, instructions, standards status, acceptance actions and change ownership.
Build the machine brief